Key result
Early supported discharge with stroke unit care significantly reduces inpatient days without significantly altering costs.
RCT (n=320)
Randomly allocated
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: An early supported discharge service (ESD) appears to be a promising alternative to conventional care. The aim of this trial was to compare the use of health services and costs with traditional stroke care during a one-year follow-up. METHODS: Three hundred and twenty patients were randomly allocated either to ordinary stroke unit care or stroke unit care combined with ESD which was coordinated by a mobile team. The use of all health services was recorded prospectively; its costs were measured as service costs and represent a combination of calculated average costs and tariffs. Hospital expenses were measured as costs per inpatient day and adjusted for the DRG. RESULTS: There was a reduction in average number of inpatient days at 52 weeks in favour of the ESD group (p = 0.012), and a non-significant reduction in total mean service costs in the ESD group (EUR 18,937/EUR 21,824). ESD service seems to be most cost-effective for patients with a moderate stroke. CONCLUSION: Acute stroke unit care combined with an ESD programme may reduce the length of institutional stay without increasing the costs of outpatient rehabilitation compared with traditional stroke care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fjærtoft et al. (2005) conducted an RCT in Acute stroke (n=320). Stroke unit care combined with early supported discharge (ESD) coordinated by a mobile team vs. Ordinary stroke unit care was evaluated on Use of health services (inpatient days) and total mean service costs (EUR) at 52 weeks (p=0.012). Early supported discharge with stroke unit care reduced inpatient days at 52 weeks with a non-significant cost reduction (EUR 18,937 vs EUR 21,824) compared to ordinary stroke unit care.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: