Why the study?
Elevations in BMI are not necessarily linked to decrements in heart function during cardiotoxic chemotherapy, prompting investigation into whether intraperitoneal fat associates with LVEF decline.
Is intraperitoneal fat associated with left ventricular ejection fraction decline in cancer patients receiving potentially cardiotoxic chemotherapy?
Is intraperitoneal fat associated with left ventricular ejection fraction decline in cancer patients receiving potentially cardiotoxic chemotherapy?
Pretreatment intraperitoneal fat, but not BMI, is associated with subsequent declines in LVEF in cancer patients receiving cardiotoxic chemotherapy, suggesting it may serve as a specific risk marker for cardiotoxicity.
Objectives Prior studies have identified a relationship between body mass index (BMI) and intraperitoneal (IP) fat with heart failure; however, in prior studies of cancer patients receiving potentially cardiotoxic chemotherapy, elevations in BMI have not necessarily been associated with decrements in heart function. This study tested the hypothesis that IP fat may be associated with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decline among cancer patients receiving potentially cardiotoxic chemotherapy. Methods In this prospective study of 61 cancer patients (23 breast cancer, 32 lymphoma, and 6 sarcoma), IP fat and other assessments of body composition, and changes in LVEF from pre‐ to postcancer treatment using noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging was ascertained. Results After accounting for age, baseline LVEF, and confounding variables, pre‐ to 24‐month post‐treatment LVEF changes were inversely correlated with IP fat ( r = −0.33; p = 0.02) and positively correlated with measures of subcutaneous (SQ) fat ( r = 0.33; p = 0.01). These LVEF changes were not correlated with BMI ( r = 0.12; p = 0.37). Conclusion Among patients receiving potentially cardiotoxic chemotherapy, pretreatment IP fat was associated with subsequent declines in LVEF. There was no association between BMI and LVEF decline. These findings may be related to a potential protective effect of SQ fat.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reding et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: