Key result
Hypodense hematoma (OR 0.104) and hematoma volume (OR 1.011) were independently associated with the outcome of wait-and-watch management in patients with primary mild chronic subdural hematoma.
Why the study?
Prognostic factors in patients with primary chronic subdural hematoma taking the natural course are unclear, prompting an evaluation of independent factors influencing wait-and-watch management.
Case-Control (n=63)
No
Odds Ratio: 0.104 (95% CI 0.028–0.385)
p-value: p=0.001
Hypodense hematoma and smaller hematoma volume independently predict successful wait-and-watch management in patients with mild primary chronic subdural hematoma.
May aid selection for conservative management in mild cSDH; leaves open prospective validation.
Prognostic factors in patients with primary chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) taking the natural course are unclear. To identify independent influencing factors of wait-and-watch management, a case–control study of moderate CSDH patients using wait-and-watch as monotherapy in a single center from February 2014 to November 2021 was conducted. A total of 39 patients who responded to wait-and-watch management (cases) and 24 nonresponders (controls) matched for age, sex, height, weight, MGS-GCS (Markwalder grading scale and Glasgow Coma Scale), and bilateral hematoma were included. Demographics, blood cell counts, serum biochemical levels, imaging data, and relevant clinical features at baseline were collected. S ignificant differences between cases and controls were found in the hematoma volume, ability to urinate, maximal thickness of the hematoma, and hypodensity of the hematoma in univariate analysis. Hypodense hematoma and hematoma volume were independently associated with the outcome in multivariate analysis. Combining these independently influencing factors revealed an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.741 (95% CI: 0.609-0.874, sensitivity = 0.783, specificity = 0.667). T hese findings may contribute to the early detection of patients with moderate CSDH who may respond to wait-and-watch strategies. Although wait-and-watch tactics could work sometimes, medical interventions, including drug treatment, should be recommended in the clinic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2022) conducted a case-control in Primary mild chronic subdural hematoma (n=63). Hypodense hematoma vs. High-density hematoma was evaluated on Response to wait-and-watch management (OR 0.104, 95% CI 0.028-0.385, p=0.001). Hypodense hematoma (OR 0.104) and hematoma volume (OR 1.011) were independently associated with the outcome of wait-and-watch management in patients with primary mild chronic subdural hematoma.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: