This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
In RNA interference (RNAi), small-interfering (si)RNAs processed from double-stranded RNA guide ARGONAUTE(AGO) proteins to silence sequence-complementary RNA/DNA. Plant RNAi can propagate locally and systemically, but despite recent mechanistic advances, basic questions/hurdles remain unaddressed. For instance, RNAi is inferred to diffuse through plasmodesmata, yet how its dynamics in planta compares with that of established symplastic-diffusion markers remains unknown. Also unknown is why select siRNA species, or size-classes thereof, are recovered in RNAi-recipient tissues, yet only under some experimental settings. Finally, RNAi shootward movement in micro-grafted Arabidopsis – necessary to study its presumptive transgenerational effects– has not been achieved thus far and endogenous functions of mobile RNAi remain scarcely documented. Focusing on non-amplified RNAi in Arabidopsis , we show here that ( i ) transgenic RNAi-movement, although symplasmic, only partially recapitulates the diffusion pattern of free GFP in planta , ( ii ) the presence/absence of specific AGOs in incipient/traversed/recipient tissues likely explains the apparent siRNA-selectivity observed during vascular movement, ( iii ) stress application allows endo-siRNA translocation against the shoot-to-root phloem flow, and ( iv ) mobile endo-siRNAs generated from a single inverted-repeat( IR ) locus, have the potential to regulate hundreds of transcripts. Our results close important knowledge-gaps, rationalize previously-noted inconsistencies between mobile RNAi settings, and provide a framework for functional endo-siRNA studies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brosnan et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: