Key result
Older people are chronically and unjustifiably underrepresented in interventional clinical trials, leading to a patchy and dubious evidence base for their medical treatment.
Highlights the chronic underrepresentation of older adults in clinical trials and the resulting lack of robust evidence for treating this growing demographic.
Clinicians should apply trial results cautiously to older patients; leaves open the need for age-inclusive studies to close evidence gaps.
The population growth and demographic changes have been remarkable in the past century, leading to a massive growth in the older population. Older people constitute the largest group of consumers of medications globally and will continue to be so for the foreseeable future. There has been chronic and unjustifiable underrepresentation of older people in interventional clinical trials, as has been evident in the majority of landmark studies that have been designed to address questions very pertinent to older people as well in many different medical specialties. Chronological age itself or comorbidity, or both in combination, have been instrumental directly or indirectly for systematic exclusion of older people from these clinical trials. Hence the evidence base for treating older people with medical conditions that usually tend to coexist in a given older person is rather patchy and dubious, leading to speculation of benefit from interventions as a result of extrapolation of inferences from trials in younge...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fernando et al. (2013) conducted a review in Underrepresentation in clinical trials. Older people are chronically and unjustifiably underrepresented in interventional clinical trials, leading to a patchy and dubious evidence base for their medical treatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: