This was a contextual study using a cross-sectional survey. The objective was to study the quality of working life and the personal factors related to the quality of work life of personnel at the College of Allied Health Sciences Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University Samut Songkhram Province Education Center. The researcher used a random number table to select a simple random sample of 77 participants who were not replaced. Data analysis provided descriptive statistics such as frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation. Inferential statistics, including multiple regression, also were derived. The findings indicated that of the factors that contribute to the quality of the working life at the Education Center the highest score went to cooperation and interpersonal relationship. However, the type of staff and gender did the most to can explain variations in the quality of life in the workforce. Fair and adequate income and progression and stability of job could describe the quality of work life of personnel by 52 percent. Further study relating to organization loyalty, corporate culture and corporate communication should be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rojanabenjakun et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: