Key result
A wrist-worn personal fitness tracker showed excellent accuracy for heart rate monitoring compared with continuous ECG (r = 0.99) and pulse oximetry (r = 0.99) in children undergoing surgery.
Why the study?
Does a wrist-worn personal fitness tracker accurately measure heart rate compared to continuous ECG in children undergoing elective surgery?
Observational (n=30)
Does a wrist-worn personal fitness tracker accurately measure heart rate compared to continuous ECG in children undergoing elective surgery?
Effect estimate: r = 0.99
A wrist-worn personal fitness tracker provides highly accurate heart rate measurements compared to continuous ECG in children undergoing surgery.
The reliability of wearable photoplethysmography (PPG) sensors to measure heart rate (HR) in hospitalized patients has only been demonstrated in adults. We evaluated the accuracy of HR monitoring with a personal fitness tracker (PFT) in children undergoing surgery. HR monitoring was performed using a wrist-worn PFT (Fitbit Charge HR) in 30 children (8.21 ± 3.09 years) undergoing laparoscopy (n = 8) or open surgery (n = 22). HR values were analyzed preoperatively and during surgery. The accuracy of HR recordings was compared with measurements recorded during continuous electrocardiographic (cECG) monitoring; HRs derived from continuous monitoring with pulse oximetry (SpO2R) were used as a positive control. PFT-derived HR values were in agreement with those recorded during cECG (r = 0.99) and SpO2R (r = 0.99) monitoring. PFT performance remained high in children < 8 years (r = 0.99), with a weight < 30 kg (r = 0.99) and when the HR was < 70 beats per minute (bpm) (r = 0.91) or > 140 bpm (r = 0.99). PFT accuracy was similar during laparoscopy and open surgery, as well as preoperatively and during the intervention (r > 0.9). PFT–derived HR showed excellent accuracy compared with HRs measured by cECG and SpO2R during pediatric surgical procedures. Further clinical evaluation is needed to define whether PFTs can be used in different health care settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pelizzo et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Children undergoing surgery (n=30). Wrist-worn personal fitness tracker (Fitbit Charge HR) vs. Continuous electrocardiographic (cECG) monitoring and pulse oximetry (SpO2R) was evaluated on Accuracy of heart rate recordings (r = 0.99). A wrist-worn personal fitness tracker showed excellent accuracy for heart rate monitoring compared with continuous ECG (r = 0.99) and pulse oximetry (r = 0.99) in children undergoing surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: