What does this research mean for the field?

Wrist-worn optical heart rate monitors using photoplethysmography provide clinically acceptable heart rate measurements that agree within 5 beats per minute of gold-standard continuous ECG in perioperative settings. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.CONFIRMATORY. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

July 27, 2021JMIR CardioOpen Access

Validation of Heart Rate Extracted From Wrist-Based Photoplethysmography in the Perioperative Setting: Prospective Observational Study

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Why the study?

Heart rate monitoring via unobtrusive wrist-worn optical monitors could enable earlier recognition of patient deterioration, but agreement with gold-standard ECG monitoring needed perioperative validation.

Does a wrist-worn optical heart rate monitor accurately measure heart rate compared to a 5-lead ECG in patients undergoing surgery?

Population

99 patients undergoing surgery requiring anesthesia

Comparison

Wrist-worn optical heart rate monitor vs gold standard 5-lead ECG

Design

Prospective observational study

Authors

EMEveline H. J. Mestrom RDRuben Deneer ABA. Bonomi

Discussion

Member takes

Overview

Wrist-worn PPG may offer acceptable perioperative HR agreement; leaves open prospective validation before routine adoption.

Structured PICO

Does a wrist-worn optical heart rate monitor accurately measure heart rate compared to a 5-lead ECG in patients undergoing surgery?

Population

99 patients undergoing surgery requiring anesthesia

Intervention

Wrist-worn optical heart rate monitor (OHRM) using photoplethysmography (PPG)

Comparator

Gold standard 5-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) connected to a patient monitor

Outcome

Agreement between the HR reported by the patient's monitor and the HR extracted from the OHRM's PPG signal assessed using Bland-Altman analysis during the surgical and recovery phasesurrogate

A wrist-worn optical heart rate monitor can measure heart rate within clinically acceptable limits compared to a 5-lead ECG in the perioperative setting.

Cite This Study

Mestrom et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bc8dbea84844e355ef447 https://doi.org/10.2196/27765

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

July 27, 2021JMIR CardioOpen Access

Validation of Heart Rate Extracted From Wrist-Based Photoplethysmography in the Perioperative Setting: Prospective Observational Study

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Why the study?

Does a wrist-worn optical heart rate monitor accurately measure heart rate compared to a 5-lead ECG in patients undergoing surgery?

Population

99 patients undergoing surgery requiring anesthesia

Comparison

Wrist-worn optical heart rate monitor vs gold standard 5-lead ECG

Design

Prospective observational study

Authors

EMEveline H. J. Mestrom RDRuben Deneer ABA. Bonomi

Discussion

Member takes

Overview

Wrist-worn PPG may offer acceptable perioperative HR agreement; leaves open prospective validation before routine adoption.

Structured PICO

Does a wrist-worn optical heart rate monitor accurately measure heart rate compared to a 5-lead ECG in patients undergoing surgery?

Population

99 patients undergoing surgery requiring anesthesia

Intervention

Wrist-worn optical heart rate monitor (OHRM) using photoplethysmography (PPG)

Comparator

Gold standard 5-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) connected to a patient monitor

Outcome

Agreement between the HR reported by the patient's monitor and the HR extracted from the OHRM's PPG signal assessed using Bland-Altman analysis during the surgical and recovery phasesurrogate

A wrist-worn optical heart rate monitor can measure heart rate within clinically acceptable limits compared to a 5-lead ECG in the perioperative setting.

Cite This Study

Mestrom et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bc8dbea84844e355ef447 https://doi.org/10.2196/27765

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark