Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
November 1, 1996Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reduction of false-positive diagnosis of fetal growth restriction by application of customized fetal growth standards

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MMM. MongelliNepean HospitalJGJason GardosiPerinatal Institute

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Mongelli et al. (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a71b644e36a167817e371c2https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-7844(96)00285-2
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Mid-arm circumference and mid-arm/head circumference ratios: Standard curves for anthropometric assessment of neonatal nutritional status1986 · 96 citations
  2. 2In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard.1991 · 1,289 citations
  3. 3DIAGNOSIS OF IMPAIRED FETAL GROWTH IN NEWBORN INFANTS1971 · 364 citations
  4. 4Are babies of normal birth weight who fail to reach their growth potential as diagnosed by ultrasound at increased risk?1995 · 51 citations
  5. 5Birth weight from pregnancies dated by ultrasonography in a multicultural British population.1993 · 200 citations