Key result
A cardio-ankle vascular index of ≥9.0 (OR 1.23) and higher coronary artery calcium scores significantly predicted future total cardiovascular events in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
Does Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) score compared with Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI) better predict cardiovascular events in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes?
Cohort (n=626)
No
Does Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) score compared with Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI) better predict cardiovascular events in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes?
Both CAC score ≥ 100 and CAVI ≥ 9.0 predict future cardiovascular events in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes, though very high CAC (≥ 1000) has the highest predictive value.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid risk stratification in asymptomatic T2DM; leaves open whether CAVI or CAC alters management.
AIM: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score has a role in stratifying cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes. Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) is also a useful method to detect coronary artery calcification. This study compares CAC score with CAVI in the prediction of cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes. METHODS: From August 2006 to June 2008, a total of 626 patients with diabetes who received CAC score assessment with concomitant tests of ankle-brachial index and CAVI were included in this study. RESULTS: During 4 years of follow-up, 98 participants developed cardiovascular events. There is an increased incidence of coronary revascularization and total cardiovascular events with higher categories of CAC score (P < 0.05 when CAC score ≥ 100). The logistic regression analyses revealed pooled odd ratios for coronary revascularization, and total cardiovascular events were 1.25 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03- 1.51, P =0.021] and 1.23 (95% CI 1.07-1.42, P = 0.005), respectively, for high versus low CAVI (CAVI ≥ 9.0 vs CAVI < 9.0). The logistic regression model revealed that a CACscore of ≥ 1000 rather than a CAVI of ≥ 9.0 had a higher predictive value for total cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: A CAC score of ≥ 100 or a CAVI of ≥ 9.0 predicts future total cardiovascular events in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes. Considering the advantages of CAVI, it can be used as one of the screening tools to reflect coronary atherosclerosis in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chung et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Asymptomatic type 2 diabetes (n=626). High Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI ≥9.0) vs. Low Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI <9.0) was evaluated on Total cardiovascular events (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.07-1.42, p=0.005). A cardio-ankle vascular index of ≥9.0 (OR 1.23) and higher coronary artery calcium scores significantly predicted future total cardiovascular events in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: