Key result
Diabetes was associated with a significantly higher mean carotid intima-media thickness compared to nondiabetic controls (0.97 ± 0.4 mm vs 0.73 ± 0.1 mm; P=0.000).
Why the study?
Information on common carotid artery intima-media thickness in healthy individuals and those with cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes was lacking in Northeastern Nigeria.
Is carotid intima-media thickness increased in adult diabetic patients compared to normal adults?
Case-Control (n=210)
No
Is carotid intima-media thickness increased in adult diabetic patients compared to normal adults?
Adult diabetic patients in Northeastern Nigeria have significantly higher carotid intima-media thickness compared to healthy controls, correlating positively with age.
Background: The carotid intima–media thickness (CIMT) has been established as an early predictor of general arteriosclerosis in patients with diabetes. However, there is a paucity of information on CIMT of the common carotid artery (CCA) in healthy patients and in patients with risk factors for cardiovascular diseases such as diabetics, hypertension, and obesity in our environment. The aim of this study was to compare the CIMT in adult patients with diabetes and normal subjects in our institution in Gombe, Northeastern Nigeria. Materials and Methods: This case–control study was conducted over a period of 8 months (from April 2015 to December 2015) at Federal Teaching Hospital, Gombe, on 105 adult diabetic patients and 105 normal adults aged 18 years and above. The CCA was scanned with a PHILIPS HD-9 ultrasound scanner equipped with Doppler facility using a 7.5 MHz linear transducer. Three measurements of the CIMT were obtained at 1 cm proximal to the right and left carotid bulbs and the mean value of the measurements was recorded. Results: The age range of the diabetics comprising 54% of males and 46% of females was 23–79 years, while the range of control group comprising of 53% of males and 47% of females was 18–68 years. The overall mean CIMT (MCIMT) was 0.97 ± 0.4 mm and 0.73 ± 0.1 mm for diabetics and nondiabetic subjects, respectively. MCIMT was significantly higher in diabetics compared to nondiabetic subjects (P = 0.000). In diabetics, overall MCIMT values were 0.96 ± 0.2 mm and 0.91 ± 0.2 mm on the right and left sides, respectively, with a statistically significant difference between the two sides (P = 0.000), while in the normal group, the overall MCIMT values on the right and left sides were 0.75 ± 0.1 mm and 0.73 ± 0.1 mm, respectively, with a statistically significant difference between the two sides (P = 0.021). Furthermore, CIMT correlated positively with age in both diabetic and control groups. Conclusion: This study has shown a statistically significant increase in CIMT in diabetics compared to nondiabetics and age shows a significant correlation with CIMT. Reference value for CIMT in nondiabetic subjects in Northeastern Nigeria has been obtained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dahiru et al. (2020) conducted a case-control in Diabetes (n=210). Diabetes vs. Nondiabetic subjects was evaluated on Overall mean carotid intima-media thickness (MCIMT) in mm (p=0.000). Diabetes was associated with a significantly higher mean carotid intima-media thickness compared to nondiabetic controls (0.97 ± 0.4 mm vs 0.73 ± 0.1 mm; P=0.000).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: