Key result
A community liaison pharmacist home visit after hospital discharge did not change the number of medications taken at 8-12 weeks (7.72 vs 7.55, P=0.662) but improved medication understanding (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does a community liaison pharmacy service improve medication adherence and knowledge in patients discharged from acute-care hospitals?
RCT
randomised
Yes
Does a community liaison pharmacy service improve medication adherence and knowledge in patients discharged from acute-care hospitals?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.72% vs 7.55%
p-value: p=0.662
A community liaison pharmacy service involving a home visit shortly after hospital discharge improves patient medication understanding and adherence.
Objective The aim of this study was to provide a pharmacy service to improve continuity of patient care across the primary-secondary care interface. Setting The study involved patients discharged from two acute-care tertiary teaching hospitals in Melbourne, Australia, returning to independent living. Methods Consecutive patients admitted to both hospitals who met the study criteria and provided consent were recruited. Recruited patients were randomised to receive either standard care (discharge counselling, provision of compliance aids and communication with primary healthcare providers when necessary) or the intervention (standard care and a home visit from a community liaison pharmacist (CLP) within 5 days of discharge). Participant medication was reviewed during the visit according to set protocols and compliance and medication understanding was measured. All participants were telephoned 8–12weeks after discharge to assess the impact of the intervention on adherence and medication knowledge. Key findings The CLP visited 142 patients with a mean time of 4.2 days following hospital discharge (range = 1–14 days). Consultations lasted 15–105 min (mean, 49 min; SD, ± 21 min). The CLPs retrospectively coded 766 activities and interventions that occurred during home visits, subsequently categorised into three groups: counselling and education, therapeutic interventions and other interventions. No statistical difference was detected in the number of medications patients reported taking at follow-up: the mean value was 7.72 (SD, ± 3.27) for intervention patients and 7.55 (SD, ± 3.27) for standard-care patients (P = 0.662). At follow-up self-perceived medication understanding was found to have improved in intervention patients (P < 0.001) and significant improvements from baseline in medication adherence were found in both standard-care (P < 0.022) and intervention (P < 0.005) groups; however, adherence had improved more in intervention patients. Conclusion The community liaison pharmacy service provided critical and useful interventions and support to patients, minimising the risk of medication misadventure when patients were discharged from hospital to home.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vuong et al. (2008) conducted an RCT in Hospital discharge to independent living. Community liaison pharmacist (CLP) home visit vs. Standard care was evaluated on Number of medications patients reported taking at follow-up (p=0.662). A community liaison pharmacist home visit after hospital discharge did not change the number of medications taken at 8-12 weeks (7.72 vs 7.55, P=0.662) but improved medication understanding (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: