Single-effort isometric handgrip strength tests are widely used as a proxy of overall muscular strength. While using peak force (PF) is practical and meaningful, additional force-time characteristics could provide insight into muscle function. The purpose of this study was to assess test-retest reliability of force-time characteristics for maximal voluntary handgrip contractions (Analysis 1) and assess the influence of fatigability and time-of-day (Analysis 2). Nineteen participants completed Analysis 1 (23.5 ± 5.7 years, 168.7 ± 8.3 cm, 75.4 ± 14.0 kg) and 18 participants completed Analysis 2 (23.4 ± 5.9 years, 168.7 ± 10.4 cm, 77.6 ± 14.6 kg). For both analyses, participants completed three 4-s maximal voluntary handgrip contractions with 1-min rest periods. For Analysis 2, participants completed the maximal voluntary handgrip contractions before and after a fatiguing handgrip intervention at three separate times-of-day. Variables included PF, time to PF, time to 90% PF (TT90), area under the curve deficit (AUC Deficit), plateau force coefficient of variation, and plateau derivative root mean square. Using point estimates, all dependent variables demonstrated moderate-excellent relative reliability. A Time-of-day × Fatigability interaction was observed for TT90, AUC Deficit, and force coefficient of variation. Main effects of fatigability were observed for all variables, excluding plateau derivative root mean square. Time-of-day did not demonstrate an impact to any dependent variable. While task specific, an adequate warm-up may mitigate time-of-day impact to performance previously reported. TT90 and force maintenance variables, such as AUC Deficit, and force coefficient of variation, appear to be sensitive to the interaction between time-of-day and fatigability. Force maintenance variables may provide further insight beyond PF when examining maximal effort handgrip strength.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lebron et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: