Key result
Oral nicorandil administration before primary coronary angioplasty did not significantly improve ST-segment resolution compared to placebo in patients with acute STEMI (68.1% vs 62.9%, p=0.27).
Why the study?
While intravenous and intracoronary nicorandil increase myocardial salvage in STEMI, the cardioprotective effects of oral nicorandil prior to primary PCI were not well documented.
Does oral nicorandil pre-treatment improve ST-segment resolution and clinical outcomes in patients with acute STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention?
RCT (n=240)
Double-blind
Table of random numbers
No
Does oral nicorandil pre-treatment improve ST-segment resolution and clinical outcomes in patients with acute STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention?
Absolute Event Rate: 68.1% vs 62.9%
p-value: p=0.27
Oral nicorandil pre-treatment before primary PCI in STEMI patients did not improve ST-segment resolution but significantly reduced in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events.
Does not support pre-PCI nicorandil in STEMI; challenges earlier positive reports and directs research to other adjuncts.
Introduction : Literature has shown the effects of intravenous/intracoronary nicorandil on increased myocardial salvage in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with mechanical reperfusion. However, the possible cardioprotective effect of oral nicorandil on the clinical outcome prior to primary coronary angioplasty is not well documented. Our aim was to assess the effect of oral nicorandil on primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Methods: A total of 240 patients with acute STEMI undergoing PPCI were randomly assigned to oral nicorandil (Intervention, n=116) and placebo (Control, n=124) groups. The intervention group received 20 mg oral nicorandil at the emergency department and another 20 mg oral nicorandil in the catheterization laboratory just before the procedure. The control group received matched placebo. Our primary outcome was ST-segment resolution ≥50% one hour after primary angioplasty. Secondary outcome was in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of death, ventricular arrhythmia, heart failure and stroke. Results: In the patients of intervention and control groups, the occurrence of ST-segment resolution ≥ 50% were 68.1% and 62.9% respectively, ( P =0.27). In-hospital MACE occurred less frequently in the intervention group, compared to placebo group (11.2% vs. 22.5%, P =0.012). Conclusion: Although the administration of oral nicorandil before primary coronary angioplasty did not improve ST-segment resolution in patients with acute STEMI, its promoting effects was remarkable on in-hospital clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akbari et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=240). Oral nicorandil vs. Placebo was evaluated on ST-segment resolution ≥50% one hour after primary angioplasty (p=0.27). Oral nicorandil administration before primary coronary angioplasty did not significantly improve ST-segment resolution compared to placebo in patients with acute STEMI (68.1% vs 62.9%, p=0.27).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: