Key result
Intracoronary stents raise peak tissue temperature by ~2.7 °C during epicardial PEF ablation.
Why the study?
Pulsed electric field ablation has been proposed to treat atrial fibrillation by ablating cardiac ganglionic plexi, but the effect of nearby metal intracoronary stents has not yet been assessed.
Does the presence of a metal intracoronary stent alter the electrical and thermal disturbance during epicardial pulsed electric field ablation in a 2D numerical model?
Does the presence of a metal intracoronary stent alter the electrical and thermal disturbance during epicardial pulsed electric field ablation in a 2D numerical model?
In silico modeling suggests that epicardial pulsed electric field ablation near a metal intracoronary stent causes moderate, non-damaging thermal heating and does not significantly alter the ablation zone.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Alerts to possible minor heating near stents in epicardial PEF; leaves open need for in vivo safety data.
Background: Pulsed Electric Field (PEF) ablation has been recently proposed to ablate cardiac ganglionic plexi (GP) aimed to treat atrial fibrillation. The effect of metal intracoronary stents in the vicinity of the ablation electrode has not been yet assessed. Methods: A 2D numerical model was developed accounting for the different tissues involved in PEF ablation with an irrigated ablation device. A coronary artery (with and without a metal intracoronary stent) was considered near the ablation source (0.25 and 1 mm separation). The 1000 V/cm threshold was used to estimate the ‘PEF-zone’. Results: The presence of the coronary artery (with or without stent) distorts the E-field distribution, creating hot spots (higher E-field values) in the front and rear of the artery, and cold spots (lower E-field values) on the sides of the artery. The value of the E-field inside the coronary artery is very low (~200 V/cm), and almost zero with a metal stent. Despite this distortion, the PEF-zone contour is almost identical with and without artery/stent, remaining almost completely confined within the fat layer in any case. The mentioned hot spots of E-field translate into a moderate temperature increase (<48 °C) in the area between the artery and electrode. These thermal side effects are similar for pulse intervals of 10 and 100 μs. Conclusions: The presence of a metal intracoronary stent near the ablation device during PEF ablation simply ‘amplifies’ the E-field distortion already caused by the presence of the vessel. This distortion may involve moderate heating (<48 °C) in the tissue between the artery and ablation electrode without associated thermal damage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
González‐Suárez et al. (2022) studied Atrial fibrillation (epicardial Pulsed Electric Field ablation of cardiac ganglionic plexi). Epicardial Pulsed Electric Field (PEF) ablation in the presence of a metal intracoronary stent vs. Coronary artery without stent and absence of coronary artery was evaluated on Peak tissue temperature (Tmax) at 0.25 mm distance between electrode and artery (MD 2.7 °C). A metal intracoronary stent during epicardial PEF ablation amplified E-field distortion and increased peak tissue temperature from 44.5 °C to 47.2 °C at 0.25 mm without altering the 1000 V/cm ablation zone.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: