This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Topic: 25. Gene therapy, cellular immunotherapy and vaccination - Clinical Background: Neutropenia and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) are two major toxicities of Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cell therapy. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is an ideal candidate treatment for neutropenia except for its potential aggravation of CRS. We hypothesized that the optimal timing of supplemental with GM-CSF in a shortage of host immunity and CAR T-cell was chosen as avoidance of CRS. Aims: We explored GM-CSF as a therapeutic intervention aimed at alleviating neutropenia, promoting cellular immunity recovery, as well as enhancing CAR T-cell expansion in patients. In this cohort, nine patients undergone different CAR T-cell therapies have been treated with GM-CSF, to assess the safety and efficacy of GM-CSF intervention post-CAR T-cell therapy while circulating CAR T-cell declined. Methods: Nine patients were enrolled in cohort from July 2021 and November 2021 to receive GM-CSF therapy whose clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. GM-CSF was subcutaneous administrated. The indication for initiation of GM-CSF therapy was patients who display moderate neutropenia with absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) <1500 cells/mm3. The indication for termination of GM-CSF therapy, was either when their ANC levels had reached to 3000-5000 cells/mm3. All patients started GM-CSF at 100ug daily. After 3 days, the dose of GM-CSF in two patients was escalated to 200ug daily because no increment in WBC was observed. Results: The median duration of GM-CSF intervention was 15 days (4-30). The median interval between start of GM-CSF and CAR T-cell infusion was 20 days (8-126) while the number of CAR T-cell in peripheral blood (PB) dropped to 20.3% (0-59.7) of pre-GM-CSF peak except for patient #2 who had no CAR T-cell expansion before GM-CSF administration. The median duration of GM-CSF intervention was 15 days (4-30). Seven out of nine patients (77.8%) experienced CAR T-cell expansion in PB during GM-CSF usage. The median baseline and peak CAR T cells count in PB of the seven patients with CAR T-cell expansion were 0.85×106/L (0-50.9) and 6.06×106/L (1.43-112.55). The peaks of CAR T-cell levels appeared in day 7(2-11) following the initiation of GM-CSF administration with increases of 2.84×106/L (0.38-61.65). In addition, although no increased CAR T-cell count in PB was observed in patients #8 and #9, the percentage of CAR T-cell in cerebrospinal fluid of patient #8 increased from 4.43% to 35.78% at day 6 and dropped to 1.38% at day 10 meanwhile GM-CSF was administrated. Also, increased white blood cells in PB was observed in all patients. The median onset and duration time of WBC recovery were 9 (1-14) and 17(3-53) days. Moreover, the increment of WBC, neutrophil, lymphocyte and CD3-CD16+CD56+ natural killer cell in PB was observed. In addition, no CRS or fatal infection occurred during GM-CSF treatment. Summary/Conclusion: Overall, we explored the timing of GM-CSF administration to play a role in CAR T-cell expansion and cellular immunity recovery without inducing CRS which facilitates to increase durable complete responses and decrease infection rates after CAR T therapy. On the basis of these results, this approach may improve the overall safety and efficacy of CAR T therapies for cancer patients and may eliminate the need for robust anti-infection treatment. Therefore, this study provides evidence for the clinical feasibility of combining CAR T-cell therapy with the GM-CSF to treat neutropenia patients with concomitant declination of circulating CAR T-cell.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: