Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: We evaluated the effects of GRC-6211, an orally active TRPV1 antagonist, on the function and noxious input of naïve and inflamed bladders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In urethane (Sigma(R)) anesthetized rats 0.5 ml GRC-6211 (0.001, 0.01, 0.1 and 1 mg/kg weight) or its vehicle (0.5% methylcellulose) were administered through a duodenal catheter and cystometry was done during infusion of saline, 100 microM capsaicin or 0.5% acetic acid (Merck, Feltham, United Kingdom). Cystometry was also performed in WT and TRPV1 knockout mice treated with 1 mg/kg GRC-6211. Cystometry was done in rats inflamed with lipopolysaccharide after receiving 0.1 mg/kg GRC-6221 or vehicle. Spinal c-fos expression induced by 0.5% acetic acid was investigated after 0.1 mg/kg GRC-6211 or vehicle administration. TRPV1 immunoreactivity was evaluated in the bladder after GRC-6211 administration. RESULTS: The reflex activity of rat and WT mice naïve bladders was unchanged by GRC-6211 up to a dose of 0.1 mg/kg. At 1 mg/kg contractions were transiently suppressed in naïve rats and WT mice but not in TRPV1 knockout mice. GRC-6211 (0.1 mg/kg) completely prevented capsaicin induced irritation, while the 0.001, 0.01 or 0.1 mg/kg dose decreased the mean +/- SD frequency of bladder contractions during acetic acid infusion from 1.5 +/- 0.3 to 1.35 +/- 0.35 (not significant), 0.9 +/- 0.2 (p <0.05) and 0.8 +/- 0.2 (p <0.05), respectively. Lipopolysaccharide inflamed rats had 1.4 +/- 0.4 and 0.8 +/- 0.1 contractions per minute after vehicle and GRC-6211, respectively (p <0.05). The c-fos expression induced by acetic acid was decreased by GRC-6211 (85.5 +/- 19.1 to 46.7 +/- 9.4, p <0.05). GRC-6211 did not change bladder TRPV1 immunoreactivity. CONCLUSIONS: GRC-6211 counteracts the bladder hyperactivity and noxious input induced by cystitis. At high doses it suppresses normal bladder activity by a TRPV1 dependent mechanism. TRPV1 antagonists might be useful for cystitis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Charrua et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: