Key result
Ultrasound measurement of mean fibrous cap thickness accurately discriminated symptomatic from asymptomatic carotid plaques (AUC 0.88; 95% CI 0.79-0.97).
Why the study?
Can ultrasound measurement of fibrous cap thickness accurately discriminate symptomatic from asymptomatic carotid atheromas?
Observational (n=54)
Can ultrasound measurement of fibrous cap thickness accurately discriminate symptomatic from asymptomatic carotid atheromas?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.88 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.97)
Ultrasound measurement of carotid plaque fibrous cap thickness is feasible and can accurately discriminate symptomatic from asymptomatic plaques.
May aid noninvasive carotid plaque risk stratification; hypothesis-generating pending prospective outcome validation.
BACKGROUND: Fibrous cap thickness (FCT) is an important determinant of atheroma stability. We evaluated the feasibility and potential clinical implications of measuring the FCT of internal carotid artery plaques with a new ultrasound system based on boundary detection by dynamic programming. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed agreement between ultrasound-obtained FCT values and those measured histologically in 20 patients (symptomatic [S]=9, asymptomatic [AS]=11) who underwent carotid endarterectomy for stenosing (>70%) carotid atheromas. We subsequently measured in vivo the FCT of 58 stenosing internal carotid artery plaques (S=22, AS=36) in 54 patients. The accuracy in discriminating symptomatic from asymptomatic plaques was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curves for the minimal, mean, and maximal FCT. Decision FCT thresholds that provided the best correct classification rates were identified. Agreement between ultrasound and histology was excellent, and interobserver variability was small. Ultrasound showed that symptomatic atheromas had thinner fibrous caps (S versus AS, median [95% CI]: minimal FCT=0.42 [0.34 to 0.48] versus 0.50 [0.44 to 0.53] mm, P=0.024; mean FCT=0.58 [0.52 to 0.63] versus 0.79 [0.69 to 0.85] mm, P<0.0001; maximal FCT=0.73 [0.66 to 0.92] versus 1.04 [0.94 to 1.20] mm, P<0.0001). Mean FCT measurement demonstrated the best discriminatory accuracy (area under the curve [95% CI]: minimal 0.74 [0.61 to 0.87]; mean 0.88 [0.79 to 0.97]; maximal 0.82 [0.71 to 0.93]). The decision threshold of 0.65 mm (mean FTC) demonstrated the best correct classification rate (82.8%; positive predictive value 75%, negative predictive value 88.2%). CONCLUSIONS: FCT measurement of carotid atheroma with ultrasound is feasible. Discrimination of symptomatic from asymptomatic plaques with mean FCT values is good. Prospective studies should determine whether this ultrasound marker is reliable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Devuyst et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Stenosing (>70%) carotid atheromas (n=54). Ultrasound measurement of fibrous cap thickness vs. Asymptomatic plaques was evaluated on Discriminatory accuracy of mean fibrous cap thickness for symptomatic plaques (AUC 0.88, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.97). Ultrasound measurement of mean fibrous cap thickness accurately discriminated symptomatic from asymptomatic carotid plaques (AUC 0.88; 95% CI 0.79-0.97).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: