Key result
A six-session self-management programme did not significantly alter preferences for or experiences of patient participation compared to standard care in patients with COPD or chronic heart failure.
Why the study?
Does a self-management programme improve patient participation in patients with chronic heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?
RCT (n=118)
Does a self-management programme improve patient participation in patients with chronic heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?
A primary care-based self-management group program did not significantly influence patients' experience of participation in the care of their chronic heart failure or COPD.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clinicians should not expect participation gains from this programme; confirms limited efficacy and directs research to alternative interventions.
BACKGROUND: Self-management strategies are crucial to patients with long-term conditions and can presumably promote patient participation, given that to patients, patient participation connotes opportunities for self-care (along with being engaged in an exchange of knowledge, a phrasing of joint goals and planning of care). So far, limited attention has been given to what components support self-management and what outcomes can be achieved. An exclusive self-management programme in primary healthcare entailed assessing its influence on patient participation. AIM: To describe the effects of a self-management programme on preferences for, and experiences of, patient participation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or chronic heart failure. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial with a six session intervention programme, including phrasing of individual action plans and group discussions on the patients' issues. The intervention group ( n=59) received standard care and the self-management programme, and the control group ( n=59) received standard care only. Data was collected at baseline and at three months and 12 months after the intervention started, using the Patient Preferences for Patient Participation (the 4Ps) measure. RESULTS: No significant differences were found within the groups, or between the groups, in preferences and experiences of patient participation, either in summary score or at an item level. CONCLUSION: A self-management group programme led by trained primary healthcare staff in primary care did not serve as means to influence patients' experience of patient participation in the care of their long-term condition. Further studies are needed in regard to what facilitates patient participation in this setting and beyond.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lühr et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Chronic heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n=118). Self-management programme vs. Standard care was evaluated on Preferences for and experiences of patient participation (Patient Preferences for Patient Participation measure). A six-session self-management programme did not significantly alter preferences for or experiences of patient participation compared to standard care in patients with COPD or chronic heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: