What question did this study set out to answer?

To identify key features, competencies, and evaluative performance metrics used within forensic psychology supervision from the viewpoints of supervisors and supervisees.

January 2, 2025The Clinical Supervisor

Forensic supervision practices: A survey of supervisors and supervisees

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

To identify key features, competencies, and evaluative performance metrics used within forensic psychology supervision from the viewpoints of supervisors and supervisees.
Surveyed forensic supervisors (n = 47) and supervisees (n = 43) recruited from forensic practice settings.
Applied a thematic approach to systematically extract competency domains and performance evaluation criteria.
Identified 10 supervision competency areas and 15 performance evaluation outcomes, with quality report writing serving as the most prevalent outcome measure.
Supervisees identified supervisors as most effective when they maintained strong supervisory relationships and integrated greater forensic-specific content into training sessions.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Survey study identifies core competencies and evaluation metrics in forensic settings, indicating that strong supervisory alliances and content-focused instruction optimize trainee development.

Cite This Study

Hodges et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a71c6eea2d7cf2e39c2dac1 https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2025.2472682

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Survey study identifies core competencies and evaluation metrics in forensic settings, indicating that strong supervisory alliances and content-focused instruction optimize trainee development.

Forensic supervision practices: A survey of supervisors and supervisees

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Forensic supervision practices: A survey of supervisors and supervisees

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study