Why the study?
Do serial pulmonary function studies help diagnose and evaluate acute pulmonary embolism?
Do serial pulmonary function studies help diagnose and evaluate acute pulmonary embolism?
Serial pulmonary function tests are useful in diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism, differentiating it from mimicking conditions, and monitoring resolution.
May support adjunctive PFT use in select PE cases; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Serial measurement of lung volumes, effort-dependent expiratory flow rates, and steady-state diffusing capacity helped to establish the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in 31 patients with angiograms demonstrating vascular obstruction. Also, analysis of results separated patients with pulmonary embolism alone from patients with pulmonary embolism and associated, pulmonary infarction, or from patients with coexistent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and left ventricular failure (the most common diseases to mimic the clinical picture of pulmonary embolism in these patients). Not only were these methods helpful in establishing the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism, but also in evaluating the rate of resolution of vascular obstruction and the deficit in pulmonary function following resolution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harry Bass (1970) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: