Key result
Ventilation/perfusion scans for acute pulmonary embolism demonstrated a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 10%.
Why the study?
What is the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ventilation/perfusion scans for acute pulmonary embolism?
What is the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ventilation/perfusion scans for acute pulmonary embolism?
Effect estimate: sensitivity 98%, specificity 10%
Ventilation/perfusion scans are highly sensitive but have very low specificity for diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism.
One of the most difficult diagnoses to make in medicine today is that of pulmonary embolic disease. In a study done in the early 1970s,1evidence of pulmonary embolism at autopsy correlated poorly to antemortem diagnosis of pulmonary embolic disease; in only one third of cases were emboli correctly identified. A batting average of.333 may be terrific for a professional baseball player, but for a physician attempting to make a diagnosis of a potentially lethal disease, such a statistic is unsatisfactory. In this week's issue ofThe Journal, an investigation of major importance, giving us information on the sensitivity and specificity of ventilation/perfusion scans in pulmonary embolism, is published.2Nearly all patients with acute pulmonary embolism had abnormal scans (high, intermediate, or low probability), but so did most patients without emboli (sensitivity, 98%; specificity, 10%). This study of more than 900 patients shows that the sensitivity of this
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roger C. Bone (1990) conducted an editorial in Pulmonary embolism (n=900). Ventilation/perfusion scans was evaluated on Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (sensitivity 98%, specificity 10%). Ventilation/perfusion scans for acute pulmonary embolism demonstrated a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 10%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: