Key result
The whole-finger gray-box model using Digital Volume Pulse waveforms estimated in-vivo %HbA1c with a mean absolute error of 0.271 and a Pearson R of 0.96 compared to invasive measurements.
Why the study?
Convenient Digital Volume Pulse acquisition can be utilized to non-invasively estimate glycated hemoglobin and blood oxygenation levels.
Observational (n=20)
A novel non-invasive whole-finger gray-box model using digital volume pulse waveforms can estimate %HbA1c and %SpO2 with high accuracy and precision.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Requires prospective validation before clinical use; leaves open noninvasive HbA1c monitoring as a research direction.
Glycated hemoglobin and blood oxygenation are the two most important factors for monitoring a patient’s oxygen levels in the blood and the amount of average blood glucose levels. Digital Volume Pulse acquisition is a convenient method, even for a person with no previous training or experience, can be utilized to estimate the two abovementioned physiological parameters. The physiological basis assumptions are utilized to develop two-finger models for estimating the percent glycated hemoglobin and blood oxygenation levels. The first model consists of a blood vessel only hypothesis, while the second model is based on a whole-finger model system. We validated our two gray-box systems on diabetic and non-diabetic patients and obtained the mean absolute errors for the percent glycated hemoglobin (%HbA1c) and percent oxygen saturation (%SpO 2 ) of 0.375 and 1.676, respectively, for the blood vessel model and 0.271 and 1.395, respectively, for the whole-finger model. The precision analysis indicated that these models resulted in 2.08% and 1.74% mean %CV for %HbA1c and 0.54% and 0.49% mean %CV for %SpO 2 in the respective models. Herein, both models exhibit close performances to each other (HbA1c estimation Pearson R values are 0.92 and 0.96, respectively), even though the model assumptions greatly differed between them. Both of the models have a very high potential to be used in real-world scenarios. The whole-finger model performs better in terms of higher precision and accuracy compared to the blood vessel model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hossain et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Diabetes (n=20). Digital Volume Pulse (DVP) waveform gray-box models vs. Invasive NGSP %HbA1c and clinical SpO2 measurements was evaluated on Mean absolute error for %HbA1c estimation (Pearson R 0.96). The whole-finger gray-box model using Digital Volume Pulse waveforms estimated in-vivo %HbA1c with a mean absolute error of 0.271 and a Pearson R of 0.96 compared to invasive measurements.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: