Key result
First ever diagnosed depression was associated with a minimally increased risk of acute infections compared to no depression (IRR 1.18), which was largely explained by underlying comorbidities and surveillance bias.
Why the study?
To assess the risk of acute infections in patients with first ever diagnosed depression compared to patients with no diagnosed depression in a primary-care database.
Does first ever diagnosed depression increase the risk of acute infections in adults?
Cohort (n=571,843)
Does first ever diagnosed depression increase the risk of acute infections in adults?
Relative Risk: 1.18 (95% CI 1.16–1.2)
Absolute Event Rate: 97.3% vs 83.7%
Patients with diagnosed depression have only a minimally increased risk of acute infections compared to those without, which is largely explained by underlying comorbidities and healthcare utilization.
PURPOSE: To assess the risk of acute infections in patients with first ever diagnosed depression compared to patients with no diagnosed depression in a primary-care database. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study using the UK CPRD GOLD database (2000-2019). We identified patients aged 18 years or older with a recorded Read code for depression (cohort entry date) and compared them to patients with no Read codes for depression using risk set sampling. Comparison groups were frequency-matched on age and sex, and comparison patients were required to have ≥ 1 general practitioner (GP) contact within 14 days before cohort entry. The primary outcome was a composite of outpatient diagnosed acute infections, including respiratory, gastrointestinal, urogenital infections and septicemia) within the two-years after cohort entry. We applied propensity score fine stratification and estimated incidence rates and IR ratios (IRR) using negative binomial regression. RESULTS: In a weighted population of 285,922 patients with diagnosed depression and 285,921 comparison patients, the IR of acute infections was 97.3/1000 person-years (py) in patients with and 83.7/1000 py in patients with no diagnosed depression. The weighted IRR of acute infection was 1.18 (95% CI 1.16-1.20) comparing those with and with no diagnosed depression. Excluding patients with baseline comorbidities yielded an IRR even closer to the null: 1.07 (95% CI, 1.04-1.09). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that patients with diagnosed depression are not at a meaningfully increased risk of acute infections compared to patients with no diagnosed depression. Slightly increased overall relative risks of infections can be explained by residual differences in health care utilization and by the severity of comorbidities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aebi et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in First ever diagnosed depression (n=571,843). First ever diagnosed depression vs. No diagnosed depression was evaluated on Composite of outpatient diagnosed acute infections (respiratory, gastrointestinal, urogenital infections and septicemia) within two years after cohort entry (IRR 1.18, 95% CI 1.16-1.20). First ever diagnosed depression was associated with a minimally increased risk of acute infections compared to no depression (IRR 1.18), which was largely explained by underlying comorbidities and surveillance bias.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: