Key result
In physically active males living high, high-intensity interval training in hypoxia compared to normoxia resulted in largely similar muscular and performance adaptations, though hypoxic training specifically enhanced isometric strength and muscle perfusion during intermittent sprinting.
Why the study?
Does hypoxic high-intensity interval training improve muscular and performance adaptations compared to normoxic training in physically active males undergoing a 'live high' protocol?
RCT (n=18)
Open-label
Randomly assigned
No
Does hypoxic high-intensity interval training improve muscular and performance adaptations compared to normoxic training in physically active males undergoing a 'live high' protocol?
Absolute Event Rate: 80% vs 76%
p-value: p=<0.05
In a 'live high' altitude training model, performing high-intensity interval training in hypoxia provides similar overall performance benefits to normoxic training, but yields specific additional improvements in isometric strength and muscle perfusion.
Hypoxic HIIT may selectively aid strength in active males at altitude; leaves open broader superiority and needs larger trials.
In the setting of ‘living high’, it is unclear whether high-intensity interval training (HIIT) should be performed ‘low’ or ‘high’ to stimulate muscular and performance adaptations. Therefore, ten physically active males participated in a 5-week ‘live high – train low or high’ program (TR), whilst eight subjects were not engaged in any altitude or training intervention (CON). Five days per week (~15.5 h per day), TR was exposed to normobaric hypoxia simulating progressively increasing altitude of ~2000 – 3250 m. Three times per week, TR performed HIIT, administered as unilateral knee-extension training, with one leg in normobaric hypoxia (~4300 m; TRHYP) and with the other leg in normoxia (TRNOR). ‘Living high’ elicited a consistent elevation in serum erythropoietin concentrations which adequately predicted the increase in hemoglobin mass (r=0.78, P0.05). Muscle oxygenation during training was lower in TRHYP versus TRNOR (P0.05). In conclusion, muscular and performance adaptations were largely similar following normoxic versus hypoxic HIIT. However, hypoxic HIIT stimulated adaptations in isometric strength and muscle perfusion during intermittent sprinting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smet et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Healthy physically active males (n=18). High-intensity interval training in hypoxia vs. High-intensity interval training in normoxia was evaluated on Repeated-sprint ability (mean torque in Nm) (p=<0.05). In physically active males living high, high-intensity interval training in hypoxia compared to normoxia resulted in largely similar muscular and performance adaptations, though hypoxic training specifically enhanced isometric strength and muscle perfusion during intermittent sprinting.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: