Key result
Greater global brain atrophy at 6 weeks was significantly associated with worse clinical outcomes, including mRS, NIHSS, executive functioning, and EQ-5D scores.
Why the study?
Is global brain atrophy associated with poor clinical and functional outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
Observational (n=97)
Is global brain atrophy associated with poor clinical and functional outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
Global brain atrophy after subarachnoid hemorrhage is associated with worse clinical and functional outcomes, independent of focal brain injury.
May refine post-aSAH prognostication; leaves open whether atrophy is causal or modifiable.
OBJECT: Atrophy in specific brain areas correlates with poor neuropsychological outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Few studies have compared global atrophy in SAH with outcome. The authors examined the relationship between global brain atrophy, clinical factors, and outcome after SAH. METHODS: This study was a post hoc exploratory analysis of the Clazosentan to Overcome Neurological Ischemia and Infarction Occurring After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (CONSCIOUS-1) trial, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 413 patients with aneurysmal SAH. Patients with infarctions or areas of encephalomalacia on CT, and those with large clip/coil artifacts, were excluded. The 97 remaining patients underwent CT at baseline and 6 weeks, which was analyzed using voxel-based volumetric measurements. The percentage difference in volume between time points was compared against clinical variables. The relationship with clinical outcome was modeled using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Older age, male sex, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) during intensive care stay were significantly associated with brain atrophy. Greater brain atrophy was significantly associated with poor outcome on the modified Rankin scale (mRS), severity of deficits on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), worse executive functioning, and lower EuroQol Group-5D (EQ-5D) score. Adjusted for confounders, brain atrophy was not significantly associated with Mini-Mental State Examination and Functional Status Examination scores. Brain atrophy was not associated with angiographic vasospasm or delayed ischemic neurological deficit. CONCLUSIONS: Worse mRS score, NIHSS score, executive functioning, and EQ-5D scores were associated with greater brain atrophy and older age, male sex, and SIRS burden. These data suggest outcome is associated with factors that cause global brain injury independent of focal brain injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tam et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (n=97). Global brain atrophy vs. Lesser or no brain atrophy was evaluated on Clinical outcome (mRS, NIHSS, executive functioning, and EQ-5D scores). Greater global brain atrophy at 6 weeks was significantly associated with worse clinical outcomes, including mRS, NIHSS, executive functioning, and EQ-5D scores.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: