Segregated signal averaging provides a valid, objective, and rapid alternative to manual analysis of beat-by-beat changes in muscle sympathetic nerve activity.
The goal of this study was to merge the methods currently used to assess beat-by-beat changes in muscle sympathetic nerve activity with a signal-averaging approach and overcome the inherent subjectivity and time-consuming nature of manual analysis of baroreflex-mediated sympathetic responses in humans. This is a retrospective study using data obtained during two prior studies [J. R. Halliwill, J. A. Taylor, and D. L. Eckberg. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 495: 279-288, 1996; C. T. Minson, J. R. Halliwill, T. Young, and M. J. Joyner. FASEB J. 13: A1044, 1999]. Beat-by-beat arterial pressure (Finapres device) and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (microneurography) were recorded in seven healthy, nonsmoking, normotensive subjects (2 men, 5 women) between the ages of 23 and 32 yr during arterial pressure changes induced by bolus injections of nitroprusside and phenylephrine. The muscle sympathetic nerve activity-diastolic pressure relationship was analyzed by both the traditional manual detection method and a novel segregated signal-averaging method. The results show the two analysis approaches are highly correlated across subjects (r = 0.914, P < 0. 05) and are in close agreement [slope for manual detection -6.17 +/- 0.91 (SE) vs. slope for segregated signal averaging -5.98 +/- 0.83 total integrated activity. beat(-1). mmHg(-1); P = 0.60]. However, a considerable time savings is seen with the new method (min vs. h). Segregated signal averaging as developed here provides a valid alternative to "by-hand" analysis of beat-by-beat changes in muscle sympathetic nerve activity that occur during dynamic baroreflex-mediated changes in sympathetic outflow. This approach provides an objective, rapid method to analyze nerve recordings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John R. Halliwill (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: