Key result
Low-intensity resistance training with mild blood flow restriction increased muscle mass more than high-intensity and low-intensity training without restriction.
Why the study?
The study evaluated changes in muscle mass, strength, vascular function, oxidative stress, and inflammatory biomarkers in older adults across different resistance training intensities with or without blood flow restriction.
Does low-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction improve muscle strength, mass, and vascular function in older adults compared to resistance training without blood flow restriction?
RCT (n=32)
randomized
Does low-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction improve muscle strength, mass, and vascular function in older adults compared to resistance training without blood flow restriction?
Low-intensity resistance training with mild blood flow restriction improves muscle strength and mass while preserving vascular function in older adults, offering an alternative for those intolerant to high loads.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low-intensity BFR RT may safely increase strength and mass in older adults; leaves open efficacy versus high-intensity training in larger trials.
BACKGROUND: Changes in muscle mass, strength, vascular function, oxidative stress, and inflammatory biomarkers were compared in older adults after resistance training (RT) performed with low-intensity without blood flow restriction (RT-CON); low-intensity with BFR (RT-BFR); and high-intensity without BFR (RT-HI). METHODS: Thirty-two untrained individuals (72±7 y) performed a 12-week RT after being randomized into three groups: RT-CON -30% of 1 repetition maximum (RM); RT-BFR -30% of 1RM and mild BFR (50% of arterial occlusion pressure); RT-HI -70% of 1 RM. RESULTS: Improvements in handgrip strength were similar in RT-BFR (17%) and RT-HI (16%) vs. RT-CON (-0.1%), but increases in muscle mass (6% vs. 2% and -1%) and IGF-1 (2% vs. -0.1% and -1.5%) were greater (p < 0.05) in RT-BFR vs. RT-HI and RT-CON. Changes in vascular function, morphology, inflammation, and oxidative stress were similar between groups, except for time to reach maximum red blood cell velocity which showed a greater reduction (p < 0.05) in RT-BFR (-55%) vs. RT-HI (-11%) and RT-CON (-4%). CONCLUSION: RT with low intensity and mild BFR improved muscle strength and mass in older individuals while preserving vascular function. This modality should be considered an adjuvant strategy to improve muscle function in older individuals with poor tolerance to high loads.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lopes et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in untrained older adults (n=32). Low-intensity resistance training with mild blood flow restriction (RT-BFR) vs. Low-intensity without BFR (RT-CON) and high-intensity without BFR (RT-HI) was evaluated on Increase in muscle mass (p=< 0.05). Low-intensity resistance training with mild blood flow restriction increased muscle mass more than high-intensity and low-intensity training without restriction.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: