Key result
The abstract describes the study methods but does not report the results regarding the relationship between myocardial injury and early recurrence of atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Is there a relationship between serum hs-TnI levels and early recurrence of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation?
Observational (n=141)
Is there a relationship between serum hs-TnI levels and early recurrence of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation?
Myocardial injury–early AF recurrence association unreported; leaves open its prognostic value for future studies.
Background: High sensitive cardiac troponin I (hs-TnI), subunit of cardiac troponin complex, is a sensitive and specific marker of myocardium injury as troponin T. Previous reports demonstrated that troponin I was more sensitive in hyperacute phase and less susceptible to hemolysis than troponin T. Several studies showed hs-TnI was associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes, but relationship between serum hs-TnI level in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and early recurrence remains unclear. Methods: We enrolled 141 patients with AF who underwent PVI (R group, radiofrequency catheter ablation, n=92; C group, cryoballoon ablation, n=49). We evaluated early recurrence (<3months) of AF (ERAF) in all study patients. We compared serum hs-TnI, high-sensitive C reactive protein (hs-CRP), white blood cell (WBC) at 48 hours after PVI and body temperature (BT, maximum value after PVI and at discharge) between patients with ERAF and those without ERAF in R group and C group, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yano et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=141). Myocardial injury (serum hs-TnI level) was evaluated on Early recurrence of atrial fibrillation (<3 months). The abstract describes the study methods but does not report the results regarding the relationship between myocardial injury and early recurrence of atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: