Key result
Hypoxic incremental inspiratory loading increased sternocleidomastoid activation compared to normoxic loading (p=0.001), while scalene activation remained similar between conditions (p=0.17).
Why the study?
The study was designed to examine scalene and sternocleidomastoid activation during normoxic and hypoxic incremental inspiratory threshold loading.
Does hypoxic incremental inspiratory loading increase scalene and sternocleidomastoid activation compared to normoxic loading in healthy participants?
RCT (n=13)
Randomly assigned
Does hypoxic incremental inspiratory loading increase scalene and sternocleidomastoid activation compared to normoxic loading in healthy participants?
p-value: p=0.001
Hypoxia increases sternocleidomastoid but not scalene muscle activation during incremental inspiratory loading in healthy individuals.
The purpose of this study was to examine scalene (SA) and sternocleidomastoid (SM) activation during normoxic (norm-ITL; FIO2 = 21%) and hypoxic (hyp-ITL; FIO2 = 15%) incremental inspiratory threshold loading (ITL). Thirteen healthy participants (33 ± 4 years, 9 female) performed two ITL tests breathing randomly assigned gas mixtures through an inspiratory loading device where the load was increased every two minutes until task failure. SA and SM root mean square (RMS) electromyography (EMG) were calculated and expressed as a percentage of maximum (RMS%max) to reflect muscle activation intensity. Myoelectric manifestations of fatigue were characterized as decreased SA or SM EMG median frequency during maximum inspiratory pressure maneuvers before and after ITL. Dyspnea was recorded at baseline and task failure. Ventilatory parameters and mouth pressure (Pm) were recorded throughout the ITL. SA,RMS%max and SM,RMS%max increased in association with ITL load (p ≤ .01 for both). SA,RMS%max was similar between norm-ITL and hyp-ITL (p = .17), whereas SM,RMS%max was greater during the latter (p = .001). Neither SA nor SM had a decrease in EMG median frequency after ITL (p = .75 and 0.69 respectively). Pm increased in association with ITL load (p < .001) and tended to be higher during hyp-ITL compared to norm-ITL (p = .05). Dyspnea was similar during both conditions (p > .05). There was a trend for higher tidal volumes during hyp-ITL compared to norm-ITL (p = .10). Minute ventilation was similar between both conditions (p = .23). RMS,%max of the SA and SM increased linearly with increasing ITL. The presence of hypoxia only increased SM activation. Neither SA nor SM presented myoelectric manifestations of fatigue during both conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Basoudan et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Healthy participants (n=13). Hypoxic incremental inspiratory threshold loading (FIO2 = 15%) vs. Normoxic incremental inspiratory threshold loading (FIO2 = 21%) was evaluated on Scalene and sternocleidomastoid activation (RMS%max) (p=0.001). Hypoxic incremental inspiratory loading increased sternocleidomastoid activation compared to normoxic loading (p=0.001), while scalene activation remained similar between conditions (p=0.17).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: