Key result
Dispositional Hope Scale supports a two-factor structure with adequate consistency in hemiplegic stroke patients.
Cross-Sectional
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Hope is an important coping strategy and psychological resource for patients with a chronic illness. Stroke patients are exposed to stressful situations such as limited daily life activities, cognitive impairments and financial burdens. AIM: This study investigated the factor structure of the Dispositional Hope Scale (DHS) and verified its validity when examining stroke patients. METHODS: This methodological study used secondary, cross-sectional data analysis to investigate the factors related to participation restriction in chronic stroke patients. The DHS's reliability was assessed by calculating the internal consistency of Cronbach's α. The structure of the DHS was analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis. The one-factor model (Korean version), two-factor model (original version) and bifactor models were compared. RESULTS: The fit indices provided evidence for the two-factor DHS model among hemiplegic stroke patients. Although the two-factor model was identified as superior by the Akaike information criterion value, both models had strong goodness-of-fit indices. The DHS had an adequate level of internal consistency in measuring hope in stroke patients. CONCLUSIONS: The DHS is a valid, reliable and useful tool for examining hemiplegic stroke patients. Identifying the psychometric properties of the DHS can help health professionals implement program development for stroke patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Hemiplegic chronic stroke. Dispositional Hope Scale (DHS) vs. One-factor model (Korean version), two-factor model (original version), and bifactor models was evaluated on Factor structure validity and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of the Dispositional Hope Scale. The Dispositional Hope Scale demonstrated adequate internal consistency and superior fit for the two-factor model over the one-factor and bifactor models in hemiplegic stroke patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: