This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
We have analysed the use of a programmed cycle of administration of exogenous steroids without prior suppression with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) for the transfer of cryopreserved-thawed pre-embryos. From July 1992 to June 1994, 199 cycles (162 patients) were studied. Pre-embryos had been previously cryopreserved at the pronuclear stage using 1.5 M 1,2-propanediol as a cryoprotectant. Preparation of the endometrium was achieved in a step-up regime with transdermal oestradiol patches (0.1 to 0.4 mg). Progesterone in oil (50 mg i.m.) was started on cycle day 13. Pre-embryos were thawed on day 14 and transferred on day 15 after evidence of survival and cleavage. The mean (+/- SD) age of patients undergoing transfer was 35.4 +/- 4.3 years. The mean number of pre-embryos thawed was 4.7 +/- 1.8 with a mean of 3.3 +/- 1.4 pre-embryos being transferred. Eight of the cycles demonstrated follicular development >16 mm prior to thaw and transfer; however, these patients did not demonstrate a luteinizing hormone surge. Mean endometrial thickness on day 13 was 10.8 +/- 2.1 mm. Overall pregnancy rate was 29.2% (57/195). The ongoing or delivery rate was 16.1% (32/195). The rate of preclinical losses per transfer was 6.2% (12/195). Overall, the implantation rate was 6.2% (47/757). Thus, the use of a programmed cycle for cryopreserved embryo transfer yields favourable pregnancy outcome and offers practical advantages to patients. Prior suppression with a GnRHa is not necessary for endometrial preparation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Queenan et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: