Why the study?
Within-day reproducibility and the impact of diurnal variation on a novel metric quantifying directional sensitivity of the cerebral pressure-flow relationship using repeated squat-stands were unknown.
The novel metric for directional sensitivity of the cerebral pressure-flow relationship demonstrates good to excellent within-day reproducibility, though it is influenced by diurnal variation.
We recently employed repeated squat-stands (RSS) to quantify directional sensitivity of the cerebral-pressure flow relationship (i.e. hysteresis) using a novel metric. Within-day reproducibility and diurnal variation impacts of this metric are unknown. We evaluated this metric for: 1) within-day reproducibility and the extent diurnal variation has in middle (MCA; ΔMCAv T /ΔMAP T ) and posterior cerebral arteries (PCA; ΔPCAv T /ΔMAP T ); 2) sex differences. Absolute (ΔMCAv T /ΔMAP T ; ΔPCAv T /ΔMAP T ) and relative (%MCAv T /%MAP T , %PCAv T /%MAP T ) metrics were calculated at seven time-points (08:00-17:00) in 18 participants (8 women; 24 ± 3 yrs) using the minimum-to-maximum MCAv/PCAv and MAP for each RSS at 0.05 Hz and 0.10 Hz. Reproducibility was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). For all metrics, reproducibility was good (0.75-0.90) to excellent (>0.90). The metric in both arteries was impacted by MAP direction at 0.10 Hz (all p < 0.024). Time-of-day influenced ΔMCAv T /ΔMAP T (0.05 Hz: p = 0.0028; 0.10 Hz: p = 0.0009), %MCAv T /%MAP T (0.05 Hz: p = 0.035; 0.10 Hz: p = 0.0087), and ΔPCAv T /ΔMAP T (0.05 Hz: p = 0.0236). Sex differences in the MCA (p = 0.0028) vanished in relative terms and was absent in the PCA. These findings demonstrate within-day reproducibility of this metric in both arteries. Moreover, hysteresis is not impacted by sex.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Labrecque et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: