Highlights the increasing rate of prophylactic carotid endarterectomies despite a lack of supporting evidence for its efficacy.
Documents historical procedural growth without evidence; leaves open whether evidence now guides carotid endarterectomy use.
Many patients with carotid artery disease experience a diversity of ocular symptoms (Table). Thus, the ophthalmologist (1) is often the first physician to see the patient or (2) is asked to act as a consultant to identify structural disease, to confirm or to exclude the presence of retinal emboli, or to perform noninvasive tests reflecting the patency of the carotid circulation. During the past decade, a number of techniques for the diagnosis of carotid artery disease have been developed. There has been a concomitant increase in the number of endarterectomies performed (15000 in 1971 to 103 000 in 1984)²on both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. This rise has occurred despite little evidence to support the efficacy of the procedure.³⁻⁵The majority of endarterectomies fall into the category of prophylactic surgery, in which the patient can be either asymptomatic (ie, patients with neck bruits revealed at routine physical examination)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William L. Becker (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: