Why the study?
Does a new Ka-band Doppler radar with advanced signal processing improve the robust detection of cardiopulmonary activities compared to conventional approaches?
Does a new Ka-band Doppler radar with advanced signal processing improve the robust detection of cardiopulmonary activities compared to conventional approaches?
A novel Ka-band Doppler radar system with advanced signal processing enables robust, non-contact monitoring of vital signs and heart rate variability, overcoming harmonic interferences and body motion artifacts.
May enable remote HR/HRV monitoring in cardiology; leaves open clinical validation before practice adoption.
In this paper, a new Ka-band Doppler radar with an ability to remotely monitor respiration rate, heartbeat rate (HR), and heart rate variability (HRV) is presented. Exploiting the advantage of high sensitivity of Ka-band radar in sensing of chest-wall movement, we make more accurate reconstruction of cardiopulmonary activities from low-quality received signal. The advantage of using Ka-band radar is obtained by paying a penalty, which is harmonic interferences that make measuring of cardiopulmonary details infeasible in lots of real scenarios. In this paper, by using a more complete model of return signal, a new routine is introduced for the robust detection of breathing and HR that extremely alleviates the problems associated with harmonic interferences. Besides, a more suitable model is proposed, which can cover time-variability cardiorespiratory features. Taking advantage of this model and based on the unconditional orthonormal representation of band-limited signals, a filter with time-varying coefficients is proposed to extract HRV. This extraction is done without resorting to tracking HR trace that makes it more precise and robust than the conventional approach. The indicated filter enables us to suggest a novel approach to remove random body motion effects. By experimental data, the applicability of the new radar for a wide range of real world scenarios is investigated, and its advantages beside conventional approaches are proved practically in different aspects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hosseini et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: