Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner for obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Does duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) improve weight loss and glycemic control in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Does duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) improve weight loss and glycemic control in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus?
DJBL offers significant but partially transient improvements in weight loss, glycemic control, and cardiovascular parameters, but carries a 17% risk of severe adverse events.
DJBL offers a viable endoscopic option for obesity and T2DM; reinforces efficacy with the largest pooled analysis to date.
Summary This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of duodenal–jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) for obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted up to September 15, 2022. Thirty studies involving 1751 patients were included. At 12 months post‐implantation, the reduction in body mass index (BMI) was 4.8 kg/m 2 (95% CI 4.1, 5.5), with an excess weight loss of 41.3% (95% CI 33.4%,49.2%) and a total weight loss of 13.1% (95% CI 10.1%, 16.0%). Significant decrease was observed in HbA1c and fasting glucose, with a standardized mean difference of − 0.72 (95% CI − 0.95, − 0.48) and − 0.62 (95% CI − 0.82, − 0.42), respectively. However, these improvements in weight loss and glycemic control were only partially sustained after explantation. In situ, DJBL significantly improves blood pressure and lipid levels. The pooled early removal rate was 19%, and the incidence of severe adverse events was 17%, including device migration (6%), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (4%), device obstruction (4%), and hepatic abscess (2%). DJBL offers significant improvement in weight loss and glycemic control, as well as cardiovascular parameters while in situ. Further studies are warranted to better understand the long‐term efficacy and safety of DJBL. The benefits of DJBL need to be carefully weighed against the risks in clinical decision‐making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: