For tests consisting of multiple subtests, unidimensional item response theory (IRT) models apply when the subtests are known to measure a common underlying ability. However, in many instances, due to the lack of a satisfactory index for assessing the dimensionality assumption, the test structure is not clear. A more general IRT model, the multiunidimensional model, is more flexible and efficient in various test situations. This article compares these two classes of normal ogive two-parameter models and shows that the multiunidimensional model offers a better way to represent test situations not realized in unidimensional models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheng et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: