Why the study?
Does oxypurinol added to standard therapy improve a composite of patient outcome and well-being in patients with stable symptomatic NYHA class III-IV congestive heart failure?
Does oxypurinol added to standard therapy improve a composite of patient outcome and well-being in patients with stable symptomatic NYHA class III-IV congestive heart failure?
The OPT-CHF trial is designed to evaluate whether the xanthine oxidase inhibitor oxypurinol improves outcomes and well-being in patients with symptomatic NYHA class III-IV heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Will test xanthine oxidase inhibition as adjunct in advanced HF; extends mechanistic rationale to definitive outcomes trial.
Oxypurinol, the active metabolite of allopurinol and a potent xanthine oxidase inhibitor (XOI), is under evaluation as a novel agent for the treatment of congestive heart failure (HF). Several lines of evidence provide the rationale for the hypothesis that XOIs will improve clinical outcomes in patients with HF. First, XOIs have unique positive inotropic effects, improving myocardial contraction and performance while simultaneously improving myocardial energy metabolism. Second, XOIs ameliorate endothelial dysfunction in humans with HF. Finally, XO activity is upregulated in the heart and vasculature of subjects with HF, which may in turn contribute to oxidative stress and/or increased uric acid levels. Together these findings form the rationale for the Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study of Oxypurinol Added to Standard Therapy in Patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III - IV Congestive Heart Failure (OPT-CHF) trial (Food and Drug Administration IND 65,125), a Phase II - III prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, which will include patients with stable symptomatic HF in NYHA class III - IV congestive HF who are deemed clinically stable on a standard and appropriately maximised heart failure therapy regimen. The efficacy end point for OPT-CHF is a composite that incorporates measures of patient outcome and well-being.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Freudenberger et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: