Why the study?
What are the pharmacokinetic and haemodynamic effects of intravenous tocainide in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by mild left ventricular failure?
What are the pharmacokinetic and haemodynamic effects of intravenous tocainide in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by mild left ventricular failure?
Intravenous tocainide causes a transient, mild reduction in cardiac index in patients with AMI and mild LV failure, without significant changes in other haemodynamic parameters or altered pharmacokinetics.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant haemodynamic monitoring with IV tocainide in AMI and mild LV failure; leaves open need for controlled safety trials.
The pharmacokinetics and haemodynamic effects of tocainide, an orally active structural analogue of lignocaine, were studied in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by left ventricular failure. Fourteen patients (mean age 65 years) with acute myocardial infarction complicated by mild left ventricular failure were studied, following a single dose of tocainide (250 mg) by intravenous infusion, over 30 min. Heart rate, systemic arterial pressure, pulmonary artery pressure and cardiac output were monitored. Plasma tocainide levels were estimated by gas chromatography. The mean plasma level of tocainide achieved was 2.95 micrograms/ml (15.37 mmol/l). The mean plasma half-life was 15.6 h. The mean cardiac index was reduced 5 min after completion of the infusion, from 2.24 1 min-1 m-2 (+/- 0.40) to 2.07 1 min-1 m-2 (+/- 0.29) (P less than 0.01). At 90 min the cardiac index had returned to pre-treatment levels. Small changes were seen in the heart rate, arterial blood pressure and the pulmonary artery pressure but these changes were not statistically significant. The pharmacokinetics of tocainide were not significantly altered in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by mild left ventricular failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MacMahon et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: