Why the study?
Does a medical-preceding therapy strategy reduce clinical events or medical costs compared to a PCI-preceding therapy strategy in patients with stable low-risk coronary artery disease?
Population
382 Japanese patients with stable low-risk coronary artery disease, mean age ~66 years, ~74% male. Excluded…
Comparison
Medical-preceding therapy vs PCI-preceding therapy, matched for age, gender…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
mean 3.4 years
Authors
Loading...
Comparable outcomes at lower cost with medical-first strategy in this cohort; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Does a medical-preceding therapy strategy reduce clinical events or medical costs compared to a PCI-preceding therapy strategy in patients with stable low-risk coronary artery disease?
In Japanese patients with stable low-risk coronary artery disease, an initial medical therapy strategy yields similar long-term clinical outcomes to an initial PCI strategy but at a significantly lower medical cost.
Tanihata et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: