Why the study?
Does primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stenting improve clinical outcomes in patients with acute right ventricular myocardial infarction presenting with threatening cardiogenic shock?
Does primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stenting improve clinical outcomes in patients with acute right ventricular myocardial infarction presenting with threatening cardiogenic shock?
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting and abciximab is a feasible and effective approach for acute right ventricular myocardial infarction complicated by threatening cardiogenic shock.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Supports feasibility of primary stenting in RV MI with shock; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Gligić et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: