Why the study?
Does 4D VM-CMR detect differences in right heart flow patterns and pulmonary artery hemodynamics between patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot and normal volunteers?
Does 4D VM-CMR detect differences in right heart flow patterns and pulmonary artery hemodynamics between patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot and normal volunteers?
Whole heart 4D VM-CMR with PC VIPR successfully detects significant alterations in right heart flow patterns and pulmonary artery hemodynamics in patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot compared to healthy volunteers.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
4D VM-CMR detects right heart flow differences in rTOF; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: To assess changes in right heart flow and pulmonary artery hemodynamics in patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) we used whole heart, four dimensional (4D) velocity mapping (VM) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS: CMR studies were performed in 11 subjects with rTOF (5M/6F; 20.1 ± 12.4 years) and 10 normal volunteers (6M/4F; 34.2 ± 13.4 years) on clinical 1.5T and 3.0T MR scanners. 4D VM-CMR was performed using PC VIPR (Phase Contrast Vastly undersampled Isotropic Projection Reconstruction). Interactive streamline and particle trace visualizations of the superior and inferior vena cava (IVC and SVC, respectively), right atrium (RA), right ventricle (RV), and pulmonary artery (PA) were generated and reviewed by three experienced readers. Main PA net flow, retrograde flow, peak flow, time-to-peak flow, peak acceleration, resistance index and mean wall shear stress were quantified. Differences in flow patterns between the two groups were tested using Fisher's exact test. Differences in quantitative parameters were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test. RESULTS: 4D VM-CMR was successfully performed in all volunteers and subjects with TOF. Right heart flow patterns in rTOF subjects were characterized by (a) greater SVC/IVC flow during diastole than systole, (b) increased vortical flow patterns in the RA and in the RV during diastole, and (c) increased helical or vortical flow features in the PA's. Differences in main PA retrograde flow, resistance index, peak flow, time-to-peak flow, peak acceleration and mean wall shear stress were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Whole heart 4D VM-CMR with PC VIPR enables detection of both normal and abnormal right heart flow patterns, which may allow for comprehensive studies to evaluate interdependencies of post-surgically altered geometries and hemodynamics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
François et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: