Key result
Multiparametric CMR safely visualizes His leads and links implant-site LGE to elevated pacing thresholds.
Why the study?
Does multiparametric cardiac magnetic resonance imaging safely identify local fibrosis (LGE) associated with pacing threshold elevation in patients with His-bundle pacing systems?
Case-Control (n=16)
Does multiparametric cardiac magnetic resonance imaging safely identify local fibrosis (LGE) associated with pacing threshold elevation in patients with His-bundle pacing systems?
Conventional 1.5T CMR can safely visualize the His-bundle pacing lead implantation site even in patients with elevated pacing thresholds, revealing an association between local fibrosis (LGE) at the lead tip and pacing threshold elevation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CMR may clarify HBP threshold mechanisms at the lead tip; leaves open any role in guiding revisions or management.
BACKGROUND: The mechanisms underlying pacing threshold elevation in His bundle pacing (HBP) despite an electrically intact lead remain poorly understood. This can compromise long-term battery life and increase the need for generator replacement or lead revision, adding procedural risk for patients and costs for healthcare systems. Using multiparametric cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), this proof-of-concept study examined whether the myocardium at the lead tip can be visualised with conventional CMR sequences, whether imaging remains safe despite elevated pacing thresholds, and whether fibrosis at the implantation site can be identified. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 16 patients with HBP systems, of whom 9 had an increased pacing threshold. A significant increase was defined as a rise of ≥1.0V/1.0 ms. All scans were performed on a 1.5T scanner using standard bSSFP cine imaging and IR TFE late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging in atrial-focused short-axis, long-axis, and modified aortic valve (AV) views to optimally visualise the HBP insertion site. LGE was assessed visually in different views. RESULTS: All MRI images were evaluable and showed no visual artefacts. The tip of the HBP lead was best visible on short-axis and AV planes. No periprocedural safety issues occurred, in particular pacing thresholds remained unaffected, demonstrating that CMR is feasible even in patients with elevated pacing thresholds, a scenario often considered a relative contraindication. In the case-control comparison, the presence of LGE at the His lead implantation site was associated with increased pacing thresholds, although our small cohort showed no association with clinical markers. Given the limited sample size, these findings are exploratory and hypothesis-generating. CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept study shows that the HBP lead implantation site can be visualized with conventional CMR sequences, and that MRI can be performed safely even in patients with elevated pacing thresholds. Pacing threshold rises were associated with LGE at the implant site, suggesting a mechanistic link and traction-related micro-injury. These findings highlight that local tissue remodeling should be considered when selecting and optimizing His-bundle implantation techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meier et al. (2026) conducted a case-control in His bundle pacing (HBP) with pacing threshold elevation (n=16). Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) at the His lead implantation site on 1.5T CMR vs. Patients without increased pacing threshold was evaluated on Presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) at the His lead implantation site and periprocedural CMR safety. Multiparametric 1.5T CMR safely visualized the His-bundle lead tip in all 16 patients (9 with threshold rise ≥1.0V/1.0 ms) and linked implant-site LGE to elevated thresholds.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: