Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Provides historical perspective on antiarrhythmic evolution; leaves open whether electrophysiologic studies retain value amid modern ablation and agents.
Concepts of antiarrhythmic therapy have undergone major changes in the past decade for a variety of reasons. First of all, electrophysiologic studies — ushered in by the observation1 that His-bundle activation could be recorded simply, safely, and reliably in human beings — have progressed from academic, research-oriented tools providing important data on mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis to procedures that yield useful clinical and therapeutic information. Tachyarrhythmias occurring infrequently can be initiated by cardiac stimulation in the laboratory; the electrophysiologic mechanisms can then be surmised, and the response to antiarrhythmic drugs evaluated. Preliminary information suggests that a drug that prevents the induction . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Douglas P. Zipes (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: