Key result
Commentary evaluates intermittent pneumatic compression device use in critical care patients.
Why the study?
Whether a recent randomised controlled trial of intermittent pneumatic compression devices truly indicates that they are ineffective in critical care patients was questioned.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Commentary questions RCT interpretation of IPC ineffectiveness in critical care; challenges conclusion and leaves efficacy open for reappraisal.
Edinburgh Research ExplorerDoes this recent randomised controlled trial of intermittent pneumatic compression devices really indicate that they are ineffective in critical care patients?Citation for published version: Dennis, M 2019, 'Does this recent randomised controlled trial of intermittent pneumatic compression devices really indicate that they are ineffective in critical care patients?',Journal of thoracic disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin Dennis (2019) conducted an editorial in Critical care patients. Intermittent pneumatic compression devices was evaluated. Intermittent pneumatic compression devices in critical care patients are discussed in this commentary, with no quantitative trial results provided in the abstract.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: