Machine learning study reveals optical coherence tomography estimates fail to reliably detect glaucoma worsening in longitudinal eyes, indicating that substantially higher accuracy is required.
Multiple glaucoma studies have attempted to generate visual field (VF) mean deviation (MD) estimates using cross-sectional optical coherence tomography (OCT) data. However, whether such models offer any value in detecting longitudinal VF progression is unclear. We address this by developing a machine learning (ML) model to convert OCT data to MD and assessing its ability to detect longitudinal worsening. In this study, we created a model dataset of 70,575 paired OCT/VFs to train an ML model to convert OCT to VF-MD. We created a separate progression dataset of 4,044 eyes with ≥ 5 paired OCT/VFs to assess the ability of OCT-derived MD to detect worsening. The progression dataset eyes had 2 additional unpaired VFs (≥ 7 total) to establish a "ground truth" rate of progression defined by MD slope. We used the ML model to generate longitudinal OCT-MD estimates for each OCT scan for progression dataset eyes. We calculated MD slopes after substituting/supplementing VF-MD with OCT-MD and measured the ability to detect progression. We labeled true progressors using a ground truth MD slope < 0.5 dB/year calculated from ≥ 7 VF-MD measurements. We compared the area under the curve (AUC) of MD slopes calculated using both VF-MD (with < 7 measurements) and OCT-MD. Because we found OCT-MD substitution had a statistically inferior AUC to VF-MD, we simulated the effect of reducing OCT-MD mean absolute error (MAE) on the ability to detect worsening. Our model's OCT-MD estimates had an MAE of 1.62 dB (better than that of any previously published models). However, we found the AUC of MD slopes with partial OCT-MD substitution was significantly worse than the VF-MD slope. Supplementing VF-MD with OCT-MD also did not improve AUC, regardless of MAE. We found that OCT-MD estimates needed an MAE ≤ 1.00 dB before AUC was statistically similar to VF-MD alone. Overall, our ML model converting OCT data to VF-MD had error levels lower than those published in prior work and was inferior to VF-MD data for detecting trend-based VF progression. Our data suggest that future models converting OCT data to VF-MD must achieve better prediction errors (MAE ≤ 1 dB) to be clinically valuable at detecting VF worsening.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pham et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: