Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thirteen communities from 7 Argentinian provinces were selected for the evaluation of serology as an indicator of transmission of Chagas disease. Of the communities appraised, 6 did not have a history of previous treatment with insecticides and 7 had received sporadic or continuous insecticide treatment. The inhabitants of 20% of the houses of each locality were studied by serology. The samples were obtained by finger pricking and 50 microliters of blood were mixed with 15 microliter of 50% glycerine solution in tissue culture media to be assayed by Indirect Hemagglutination and Indirect Immunofluorescence tests. In untreated areas, the prevalence of infection in infants 0-4 years old was 17.5%, reaching to over 22% for the 5-9 year old group, and to 33.3% in 10-14 year old individuals. The prevalence in treated and surveyed areas was 2.6% in 0-4 year old children, 5.4% in 5-9 year old and 6.2% in 10-14 year old youngsters. The differences between both areas were statistically significant (p less than 0.005). This study favors serology as a valid indicator for the evaluation of transmission of Chagas disease in rural areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chuit et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: