Why the study?
Differences between major and minor groups of human rhinovirus in upper airway epithelium have not been studied in detail, despite human nasal epithelial cells being a primary infection route.
Does HRV1B induce a different antiviral and inflammatory response compared to HRV16 in human nasal epithelial cells?
Does HRV1B induce a different antiviral and inflammatory response compared to HRV16 in human nasal epithelial cells?
The minor group rhinovirus HRV1B induces a stronger antiviral and inflammatory response in human nasal epithelial cells compared to the major group HRV16.
Minor-group HRV may drive stronger nasal epithelial responses than major-group; leaves open in vivo relevance and clinical translation.
BACKGROUND: Different species of human rhinovirus (HRV) can induce varied antiviral and inflammatory responses in human blood macrophages and lower airway epithelium. Although human nasal epithelial cells (HNECs) are a primary infection route of HRV, differences between major and minor groups of HRV in the upper airway epithelium have not been studied in detail. In this study, we investigated viral replications and immune responses of major and minor groups of HRV in the HNECs. METHODS: Viral replication, immune responses of IFN-β, IFN-λ, proinflammatory cytokines, and viral receptors, and mRNA expression of transcription factors of HRV16 (major group) and HRV1B (minor group) in the HNECs were assessed. RESULTS: Compared with HRV16, HRV1B replicated more actively without excessive cell death and produced higher IFN-β, IFN-λ1/3, CXCL10, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-18 levels. Furthermore, low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), TLR3, MDA5, NF-κB, STAT1, and STAT2 mRNA levels increased in HRV1B-infected HNECs. CONCLUSION: HRV1B induces a stronger antiviral and inflammatory response from cell entry to downstream signaling compared with HRV16.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: