In recent years, states have adopted a wide variety of joint sealing practices for jointed rigid pavements, based on local experience. Over time, the adoption of quality control/quality assurance practices has resulted in decreased inspection and attention that ensure compliance with good joint seal installation practices. At this time, several agencies have adopted or are considering a policy of providing for rigid pavement joints by using a single 3-mm (1/8-in.) saw cut. Agencies are either leaving this saw cut unfilled or filling it with hot-poured sealant, recognizing that it is not effectively sealed. This practice may prove acceptable where positive drainage features are naturally occurring (coarse-grained subgrade) or where climates are very hot and dry, resulting in minimal joint movement. Other agencies continue to use established joint-sealing practices with good pavement performance results. This approach continues to be a prudent one, particularly in wet climates with fine-grained subgrade materials. Here slab-support erosion has been shown to result in accelerated deterioration of jointed rigid pavements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morian et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: