Why the study?
Does dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system with an ACE inhibitor and an ARB reduce progression of kidney disease beyond monotherapy in patients with proteinuric renal diseases?
Does dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system with an ACE inhibitor and an ARB reduce progression of kidney disease beyond monotherapy in patients with proteinuric renal diseases?
This review examines whether combining an ACE inhibitor and an ARB offers further benefit in halting the progression of proteinuric renal diseases compared to monotherapy.
Dual RAS blockade in proteinuric kidney disease should not yet change practice; leaves open whether it slows progression beyond monotherapy.
It is well-accepted that therapies directed at the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) reduce the progression of chronic kidney disease. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and the angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are currently available to interrupt this cascade. Their positive actions result from better blood pressure control, a reduction in glomerular capillary pressure and a decrease in proteinuria. Blockade of the RAS may also reduce renal scarring by blunting direct pro-fibrotic effects of angiotensin II and aldosterone. Although these drugs successfully reduce urinary protein excretion and improve renal survival, a significant number of patients continue to progress to end stage renal disease. It is possible, however, that dual blockade of the RAS with an ACE inhibitor and an ARB might offer further benefit beyond using either agent alone. Optimally, the goal should be to completely halt the progression of kidney disease. With these concepts in mind, this paper will review the RAS and its effects on the kidney. The efficacy and safety of dual RAS blockade in proteinuric renal diseases will be examined. Finally, recommendations for utilising combined therapy with ACE inhibitors and ARBs will be provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brewster et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: